Comparative analysis of the efficiency of various forms and technologies of CO2 injection for geological storage and enhanced oil recovery
Abstract
To reduce anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, it is necessary to implement carbon capture projects followed by CO2 injection into reservoir formations for geological storage and enhanced oil recovery. This paper examines the main CO2 injection methods applied in reservoir systems for both enhanced oil recovery and long-term carbon sequestration. The analysis includes the injection of supercritical CO2, water-alternating-gas (WAG) technology, and carbonated water injection. Several studies indicate that CO2 retention is most efficient when it is injected in dissolved form within formation water compared to other methods; however, the total mass of CO2 injected under such conditions is lower. In the supercritical state, a higher mobility of the displacement front is observed, leading to improved sweep efficiency. The WAG process demonstrates intermediate performance in terms of both sweep efficiency and oil displacement effectiveness.
About the Authors
Ch. A. GarifullinaRussian Federation
D. S. Klimov
Russian Federation
References
1. Abdulsada J.A., Chen H., Wei B., Zhang D., Fan Y., Ren Y. (2025). A mini-review of water-alternating-CO2 injection process and derivations for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage in subsurface reservoirs. Petroleum, 11(4), P. 410–421.
2. Ajayi Т. и др. (2019). A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science.
3. Andrew R.M., Peters G.P. (2024). The global carbon project's fossil CO2 emissions dataset. Our World in Data.
4. Awan M.A., Kirmani F.D. (2025). CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery: analyzing the effect of injection rate and bottom hole pressure. Petroleum Research, 10(1), P. 129–136.
5. Chen K., Zhang J.-R., Xu S.-Y., Yin M.-Z., Zhang Y., Zhao Y.-C., Song Y.-C. (2024). Review of carbonated water injection as a promising technology to enhance oil recovery in the petroleum industry: Challenges and prospects. Petroleum Science, 21(6), P. 4100–4118.
6. CO2. Earth. (2024). Daily CO2 levels.
7. Davoodi Sh. и др. (2023). Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization. Gas Science and Engineering, 117, 205070.
8. Davoodi Sh. и др. (2024). Carbon dioxide sequestration through enhanced oil recovery: A review of storage mechanisms and technological applications. Fuel, 366, 131313.
9. Esene C., Rezaei N., Aborig A., Zendehboudi S. (2019). Comprehensive review of carbonated water injection for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel, 237, P. 1086–1107.
10. Fang P., Zhang Q., Zhou C., Yang Z., Yu H., Du M., Chen X., Song Y., Wang S., Gao Y., Dou Z., Cao M. (2024). Chemical-assisted CO2 water-alternating-gas injection for enhanced sweep efficiency in CO2-EOR. Molecules, 29(16), 3978.
11. Global CCS Institute. (2024). Global status of CCS report 2024.
12. Hanson E., Nwakile C., Hammed V.O. (2025). Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies: evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO2 emissions. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 18, 100381.
13. IEA. (2024). CO2 emissions in 2023.
14. Jones W., Le Quéré C., Friedlingstein P., Peters G., Andrew R.M., Davis S.J. и др. (2024). National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Scientific Data.
15. Nagireddi S. и др. (2024). Carbon dioxide capture, utilization, and sequestration: current status, challenges, and future prospects for global decarbonization. ACS Engineering Au, 4(1), P. 22–48.
16. Pavlova P.L., Minakov A.V., Platonov D.V., Zhigarev V.A., Guzei D.V. (2022). Supercritical fluid application in the oil and gas industry: A comprehensive review. Sustainability, 14(2), 698.
17. Prasad S.K., Sangwai J.S., Byun H.-S. (2023). A review of the supercritical CO2 fluid applications for improved oil and gas production and associated carbon storage. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 72, 102479.
18. Salem N. и др. (2025). Advancements in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): A comprehensive review of technologies and prospects. Clean Technologies, 7(4), 109.
19. Shafiei M., Kazemzadeh Y., Escrochi M. и др. (2024). A comprehensive review direct methods to overcome the limitations of gas injection during the EOR process. Scientific Reports, 14, 7468.
20. Talebi A., Hasan-Zadeh A., Kazemzadeh Y., Riazi M. (2022). A review on the application of carbonated water injection for EOR purposes: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 214, 110481.
21. Turkson J.N. и др. (2024). Carbonated water injection for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 geosequestration in different CO2 repositories: A review of physicochemical processes and recent advances. Energy & Fuels, 38(8), P. 6579–6612.
22. Zhang N., Yin M., Wei M., Bai B. (2019). Identification of CO2 sequestration opportunities: CO2 miscible flooding guidelines. Fuel, 241, P. 459–467.
Review
For citations:
Garifullina Ch.A., Klimov D.S. Comparative analysis of the efficiency of various forms and technologies of CO2 injection for geological storage and enhanced oil recovery. Hard-to-recover reserves. 2026;1(2):47-51. (In Russ.)
JATS XML